Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:07

Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
After trying to buy Ilya Sutskever’s $32B AI startup, Meta looks to hire its CEO - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Bristol-Myers Squibb: You Might Wish You Bought More Now (Upgrade) (NYSE:BMY) - Seeking Alpha
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sharks Follow This Universal Math Rule, Confirming a Century-Old Law of Biology - SciTechDaily
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Should a male with long hair comb his hair daily?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Dazzling Royal Diamonds and Pearls to Celebrate Trooping the Colour in London - The Court Jeweller
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Jason Sudeikis Pays Tribute To His Late Uncle George Wendt: “I Love Him Dearly” - Deadline
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.